To Match or Not to Match Samples on Ability for Equating: A Discussion of Five Articles
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Measurement in Education
- Vol. 3 (1) , 105-113
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0301_8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulation Results of Effects on Linear and Curvilinear Observed-and True-Score Equating Procedures of Matching on a Fallible CriterionApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Effect on Equating Results of Matching Samples on an Anchor TestApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Equating Methods and Sampling DesignsApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- What Combination of Sampling and Equating Methods Works Best?Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Sensitivity of Equating Results to Different Sampling StrategiesApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- A Comparative Study of the Effects of Recency of Instruction on the Stability of IRT and Conventional Item Parameter EstimatesJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988
- Linear Equating Models for the Common-item Nonequivalent-Populations DesignApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Irt Versus Conventional Equating Methods: A Comparative Study of Scale StabilityJournal of Educational Statistics, 1983
- Developing a Common Metric in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND ITEM RESPONSE THEORY METHODS FOR EQUATING TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1981