A Design-of-Instruction Analysis of Concept Teaching in Five Basal Language Programs
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Special Education
- Vol. 22 (2) , 199-219
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698802200206
Abstract
Concept-teaching procedures in five basal language programs for the early grades were reviewed and analyzed on the basis of 11 design-of-instruction criteria. These criteria were drawn from empirically based models of concept teaching. Two levels of analyses were conducted. In the first analysis, the lessons for teaching five common concepts were examined and judged. A second analysis scrutinized additional concepts selected at random from each of the programs. Results suggest that concept-teaching procedures promoted by basal language programs rarely meet the criteria. Discrepancies between and across basal language programs also were found.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reading Comprehension Instruction in Social Studies ProgramsReading Research Quarterly, 1986
- Reading Comprehension Instruction in Five Basal Reader SeriesReading Research Quarterly, 1981
- Relationships between Stimulus Variation and the Formation of MisconceptionsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1980
- Three procedures for presenting minimally different positive and negative instances.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
- Child performance on discrimination tasks: Effects of amount of stimulus variationJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977
- They Teach Concepts, Don’t They?Educational Researcher, 1975
- Teaching concepts in the classroom: A set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
- Number and type of available instances in concept learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965
- Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964
- Concept learning as a function of availability of previously presented information.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964