Public health issues arising from microbiological and labelling quality of foods and supplements containing probiotic microorganisms
Open Access
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 2 (2) , 223-229
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980099000282
Abstract
Objective: To assess the accuracy and helpfulness of labelling on products containing probiotic bacteria.Design and setting: 52 such products – 44 from the UK (21 supplements, 15 fermented functional foods, eight ‘health-care’ products) and eight from continental Europe – have been tested for microbiological content, and results compared to the information available on their labels. Products were stored in the dark at 4°C and analysed before their expiry or sell-by date. Careful note was taken of wording on labels, package inserts, packaging, promotional literature and catalogue descriptions, as applicable. Products were cultured on appropriate bacteriological media, and organisms grown were counted and identified.Results: Bioyoghurts gave no indication of numbers, and only five accurately described their bacterial content; results of culture were usually satisfactory. ‘Health-care’ products (mostly intended for the bowel) usually indicated the presence of bacteria, but the numerical content was hard to ascertain, and cultural results fell short of label claims. Supplements were sometimes incorrectly labelled in bacteriological terms, and often contained markedly reduced numbers and/or had extraneous strains and/or strains specified on the label were missing. Products from continental Europe (that were sold for specific medical indications) seemed of a higher microbiological standard. The potential pathogen Enterococcus faecium was found in nine products. The most successful of the new functional foods in Britain now contain probiotics, and probiotic preparations are prominent among the expanding range of nutritional supplements presently available to consumers.Conclusions: Our findings have public health implications, and suggest that improvements are needed in labelling and quality assurance procedures for products containing probiotic organisms. The presence of the potential pathogen Enterococcus faecium (intentionally or as a contaminant) in some products calls for a review of the value of this species as a probiotic.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Successful Probiotic StrainsNutrition Today, 1996
- Probiotics—panacea or nostrum?Nutrition Bulletin, 1996
- Probiotics and product innovationNutrition & Food Science, 1996
- Problems and Priorities for Controlling Opportunistic Pathogens with New Antimicrobial Strategies; an Overview of Current LiteratureZentralblatt für Bakteriologie, 1996
- "Probiotic" remedies are not what they seemBMJ, 1996
- Development of Selection Criteria for Probiotic Strains to Assess Their Potential in Functional Foods: A Nordic and European ApproachBioscience and Microflora, 1996
- The coming of age of probioticsTrends in Food Science & Technology, 1995
- Probiotics in human medicine.Gut, 1991