Long‐lasting allergic patch test reaction caused by gold

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by gold is rare, and only isolated cases have been reported. Patch Jesting with gold may cause a long‐lasing reaction. The purpose of this study is to describe a well‐studied case of gold allergy caused by denial gold crowns. A gold‐sensitized patient and a non‐sensitized control subject were examined using patch tests, immunohistochemistry. electron microscopy and blast transformation reactions. Sodium thiosulfate, auranofin and sodium thiomalate gave positive patch test reactions. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy were performed from biopsies taken from allergic patch lest reactions caused by gold sodium thiosulfate 1 day and 17 days after applying the patches, from normal skin and from a 17‐day‐old allergic patch test reaction caused by ammonium persulfate. Down‐regulation had taken place by 17 days in the allergic ammonium persulfate reaction, but not in the 17‐day allergic gold lest reaction. The patient reacted to all but one of the gold‐induced blast transformation tests, sodium chloroaurate being non‐inductive. The non‐sensitized control subject did not exhibit any reactions. In conclusion, gold sodium thiosulfate, gold sodium thiomalate and auranofin can be used as patch test substances for gold allergy, though long‐lasting allergic patch test reactions may develop. In vitro gold salt induced blast transformation is an alternative test for gold allergy. The slow down‐regulation of the allergic patch test reactions needs to be studied further.