Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 41 (2) , 154-167
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000195840.50230.10
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the applicability of high magnetic field strengths for comprehensive functional and structural cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eighteen subjects underwent comprehensive cardiac MRI at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The following imaging techniques were implemented: double and triple inversion prepared FSE for anatomic imaging, 4 different sets of echocardiographic-gated CINE strategies for functional and flow imaging, inversion prepared gradient echo for delayed enhancement imaging, T1-weighted segmented EPI for perfusion imaging and 2-dimensional (2-D) spiral, and volumetric SSFP for coronary artery imaging. : Use of 3 Tesla as opposed to 1.5 Tesla provided substantial baseline signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) improvements for anatomic (T1-weighted double IR: DeltaSNR = 29%, DeltaCNR = 20%, T2-weighted double IR: DeltaSNR = 39%, DeltaCNR = 33%, triple IR: DeltaSNR = 74%, DeltaCNR = 60%), functional (conventional CINE: DeltaSNR = 123%, DeltaCNR = 74%, accelerated CINE: DeltaSNR = 161%, DeltaCNR = 86%), myocardial tagging (DeltaSNRsystole = 54%, DeltaCNRsystole = 176%), phase contrast flow measurements (DeltaSNR = 79%), viability (DeltaSNR = 48%, DeltaCNR = 40%), perfusion (DeltaSNR = 109%, DeltaCNR = 87%), and breathhold coronary imaging (2-D spiral: DeltaSNRRCA = 54%, DeltaCNRRCA = 69%, 3-D SSFP: DeltaSNRRCA = 60%, DeltaCNRRCA = 126%), but also revealed image quality issues, which were successfully tackled by adiabatic radiofrequency pulses and parallel imaging. Cardiac MRI at 3.0 T is feasible for the comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology and function, although SAR limitations and susceptibility effects remain a concern. The need for speed together with the SNR benefit at 3.0 T will motivate further advances in routine cardiac MRI while providing an image-quality advantage over imaging at 1.5 Tesla.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 TEuropean Radiology, 2005
- In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratiosJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2005
- Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?European Heart Journal, 2004
- Comparison of Different Cardiac MRI Sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with Respect to Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise Ratios - Initial ExperienceRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2004
- Current Concepts and Advances in Clinical Parallel Magnetic Resonance ImagingTopics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004
- Double inversion black‐blood fast spin‐echo imaging of the human heart: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0TJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a “one-stop-shop” evaluation of myocardial dysfunctionCurrent Opinion in Cardiology, 2002
- Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coilsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2000
- The Intrinsic Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Human Cardiac Imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 TJournal of Magnetic Resonance, 1997
- "Black blood" T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart.Radiology, 1996