Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T
- 5 May 2005
- journal article
- cardiac
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 15 (8) , 1586-1597
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2768-z
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality of cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Twenty volunteers underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations using a 1.5-T and a 3.0-T scanner. Three different sets of breath-held, electrocardiogram-gated (ECG) CINE imaging techniques were employed, including: (1) unaccelerated SSFP (steady state free precession), (2) accelerated SSFP imaging and (3) gradient-echo-based myocardial tagging. Two-dimensional CINE SSFP at 3.0 T revealed an SNR improvement of 103% and a CNR increase of 19% as compared to the results obtained at 1.5 T. The SNR reduction in accelerated 2D CINE SSFP imaging was larger at 1.5 T (37%) compared to 3.0 T (26%). The mean SNR and CNR increase at 3.0 T obtained for the tagging sequence was 88% and 187%, respectively. At 3.0 T, the duration of the saturation bands persisted throughout the entire cardiac cycle. For comparison, the saturation bands were significantly diminished at 1.5 T during end-diastole. For 2D CINE SSFP imaging, no significant difference in the left ventricular volumetry and in the overall image quality was obtained. For myocardial tagging, image quality was significantly improved at 3.0 T. The SNR reduction in accelerated SSFP imaging was overcompensated by the increase in the baseline SNR at 3.0 T and did not result in any image quality degradation. For cardiac tagging techniques, 3.0 T was highly beneficial, which holds the promise to improve its diagnostic value.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratiosJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2005
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 TeslaImaging Decisions MRI, 2004
- Comparison of Different Cardiac MRI Sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with Respect to Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise Ratios - Initial ExperienceRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2004
- Vergleich der transthorakalen 3D-Echokardiographie mit der MRT zur Bestimmung linksventrikulärer Volumina bei Patienten mit pathologischer Ventrikelgeometrie aufgrund angeborener HerzfehlerRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2003
- Comparison of Cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Clinical Whole Body SystemsInvestigative Radiology, 2003
- Double inversion black‐blood fast spin‐echo imaging of the human heart: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0TJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Dobutamine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia With the Use of Myocardial TaggingCirculation, 2003
- Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady‐state free precession imaging sequencesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Die T2-gewichtete Halb-Fourier Turbo-Spin-Echo-Technik mit erhöhter Echozuglänge im Vergleich zur konventionellen T2-gewichteten Turbo-Spin-Echo-Technik für die zerebrale Magnetresonanz-tomographie. Ein SequenzvergleichRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2000
- SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999