Comparing Media Systems
Top Cited Papers
- 12 April 2004
- book
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract
Building on a survey of media institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies, Hallin and Mancini identify the principal dimensions of variation in media systems and the political variables which have shaped their evolution. They go on to identify three major models of media system development (the Polarized Pluralist, Democratic Corporatist and Liberal models) to explain why the media have played a different role in politics in each of these systems, and to explore the forces of change that are currently transforming them. It provides a key theoretical statement about the relation between media and political systems, a key statement about the methodology of comparative analysis in political communication and a clear overview of the variety of media institutions that have developed in the West, understood within their political and historical context.Keywords
This publication has 110 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of media commercialization on journalism and politics in GreeceThe Communication Review, 1999
- Changing Spaces of Political Communication: The Case of the European UnionPolitical Communication, 1999
- Communication workers in Spain: The reward of appearanceThe Communication Review, 1997
- Broadcast reform revisited: Reverend Everett C. Parker and the “standing” case (office of communication of the United church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission)The Communication Review, 1997
- News decisions: Journalists as partisan actorsPolitical Communication, 1996
- Sites of reality: Constructing press photography in Weimar Germany, 1928–33The Communication Review, 1996
- The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the wall street journalCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1990
- Comparative media research: The world according to AmericaCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1988
- Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional AnalysisSocial Forces, 1955
- The Professions and Social StructureSocial Forces, 1939