The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis
Open Access
- 7 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 23 (5) , 501-508
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1019
Abstract
Objectives To examine the interobserver reliability of three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary. Methods 3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization. Two different observers each acquired two datasets from all 40 patients resulting in 80 endometrial and 80 ovarian datasets in total. Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis was used to define the object of interest and semiquantify the power Doppler signal within it. The reliability of measurements of volume and vascularity was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement between the two observers. Results Whilst volumetric data proved more reliably acquirable than power Doppler data, the interobserver reliability of data acquisition was high overall for both the endometrium and ovary with all measurements obtaining a lower ICC of above 0.9. Limits of agreement revealed minimal disagreement between the two observers for measurements of volume and vascularity within both the ovary and endometrium. The ‘indices of vascularity’ within the endometrium were less than those derived from the ovary and subendometrium, which were comparable. Conclusions 3D ultrasound can be reliably used between observers to acquire power Doppler information from the ovary and endometrium thus supporting the current use and further development of this technique in clinical practice. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reliability of virtual organ computer‐aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusionUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three‐dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro settingUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray‐scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasonographyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Three-dimensional sonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovaries in late follicular phaseUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Uteroplacental Circulation Development: Doppler Assessment and Clinical ImportancePlacenta, 2001
- Placing value on pictures: what information is there in color flow images and how can we use it?Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Transvaginal color Doppler study of uterine blood flow in primary dysmenorrheaActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2000
- Signal from hepatic hemangiomas on power Doppler US: real or artefactual?Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 1999
- Three‐dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularizationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986