Development of a modeling framework to simulate efficacy endpoints for motesanib in patients with thyroid cancer
- 25 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 66 (6) , 1141-1149
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1449-z
Abstract
Purpose To develop a modeling framework that simulates clinical endpoints (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to support development of motesanib. The framework was evaluated using results from a phase 2 study of motesanib in thyroid cancer. Methods Models of probability and duration of dose modifications and overall survival were developed using data from 93 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer and 91 patients with medullary thyroid cancer, who received motesanib 125 mg once daily. The models, combined with previously developed population pharmacokinetic and tumor growth inhibition models, were assessed in predicting dose intensity, tumor size over time, objective response rate, and progression-free survival. Dose–response simulations were performed in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Results The predicted objective response rate and median progression-free survival in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer was 15.0% (95% prediction interval, 7.5%–23.7%) and 40 weeks (95% prediction interval, 32–49 weeks), respectively, compared with the observed objective response rate of 14.0% and median progression-free survival of 40 weeks. The simulated median objective response rate increased with motesanib starting dose from 13.5% at 100 mg once daily to 38.0% at 250 mg once daily. However, simulated median progression-free survival was independent of starting dose, ranging from 40.5 weeks (95% prediction interval, 38.6–46.9 weeks) at 100 mg once daily to 40.0 weeks (95% prediction interval, 38.6–46.8 weeks) at 250 mg once daily. Conclusions Dose–response simulations confirmed the appropriateness of 125-mg once-daily dosing; no clinically relevant improvement in progression-free survival would be obtained by dose intensification. This modeling framework represents an important tool to simulate clinical response and support clinical development decisions.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model-Based Prediction of Phase III Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer on the Basis of Phase II Tumor DynamicsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Motesanib in Patients With Progressive or Symptomatic, Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- On the Use of Change in Tumor Size to Predict Survival in Clinical Oncology Studies: Toward a New Paradigm to Design and Evaluate Phase II StudiesClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009
- Elucidation of Relationship Between Tumor Size and Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Can Aid Early Decision Making in Clinical Drug DevelopmentClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009
- Safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with solid tumoursBritish Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Predicting Success in Phase III Studies From Phase II Results: A New Paradigm Is NeededJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Motesanib Diphosphate in Progressive Differentiated Thyroid CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Recommended changes to oncology clinical trial design: Revolution or evolution?European Journal Of Cancer, 2008
- Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AMG 706, an Oral Multikinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid TumorsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- AMG 706, an Oral, Multikinase Inhibitor that Selectively Targets Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, and Kit Receptors, Potently Inhibits Angiogenesis and Induces Regression in Tumor XenograftsCancer Research, 2006