Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients

This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:

• Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
• Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial
  Published by Elsevier ,2000
• Standard aortic St. Jude valve at 18 years: performance profile and determinants of outcome
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
• Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
• Event Status of the Starr-Edwards Aortic Valve to 20 Years: A Benchmark for Comparison
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
• Durability of the hancock MO bioprosthesis compared with standard aortic valve bioprostheses
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
• Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to twelve years
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
• Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine Bioprostheses
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
• Lessons learned about the determinants of the results of valve surgery.
  Circulation, 1988
• Valve replacement—a perspective
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1975