How Biased Household Inventory Estimates Distort Shopping and Storage Decisions
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing
- Vol. 70 (4) , 118-135
- https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.118
Abstract
The authors develop a model of how consumers estimate the level of product inventory in their households. Two laboratory experiments and two field studies involving 29 product categories show that (1) consumers anchor their estimates on their average inventory and fail to adjust sufficiently; (2) adjustments follow an inelastic psychophysical power function, leading to overestimations of low levels of inventory and underestimations of high levels; and (3) adjustments are more elastic and, thus, more accurate when inventory is salient. Contrary to the assumptions of practitioners and academic modelers, these inventory estimates, not actual inventory levels, drive subsequent purchase incidence. Simulation results further show that biased estimates increase overstocking and spoilage among stockout-averse consumers but increase stockouts and unmet demand among overstocking-averse consumers. By predicting the magnitude, not just the direction, of estimation biases, the model and the results offer new insights into accelerating the consumption of healthy foods and improving the targeting of stockpiling-inducing sales promotions.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Adjustments Insufficient?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004
- Bottoms Up! The Influence of Elongation on Pouring and Consumption VolumeJournal of Consumer Research, 2003
- Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective AccessibilityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000
- An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity DecisionsJournal of Marketing Research, 1998
- Behavioral Frequency Judgments: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity FrameworkJournal of Consumer Research, 1995
- The Easy Path From Many To Much: the Numerosity HeuristicCognitive Psychology, 1994
- ?Out of sight, out of mind?: Pantry stockpiling and brand-usage frequencyMarketing Letters, 1994
- Single judgments of numerosityPerception & Psychophysics, 1982
- The effect of object shape and mode of presentation on judgments of apparent volumePerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- The Judgment of SizeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1965