Comparing Oxygen Transfer Performance Between Three Membrane Oxygenators: Effect of Temperature Changes During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
- 11 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Artificial Organs
- Vol. 31 (4) , 290-300
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00379.x
Abstract
Abstract: Recently, a new oxygenator (Dideco 903 [D903], Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) has been introduced to the perfusion community, and we set about testing its oxygen transfer performance and then comparing it to two other models. This evaluation was based on the comparison between oxygen transfer slope, gas phase arterial oxygen gradients, degree of blood shunting, maximum oxygen transfer, and diffusing capacity calculated for each membrane. Sixty patients were randomized into three groups of oxygenators (Dideco 703 [D703], Dideco; D903; and Quadrox, Jostra Medizintechnik AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) including 40/20 M/F of 68.6 ± 11.3 years old, with a body weight of 71.5 ± 12.1 kg, a body surface area (BSA) of 1.84 ± 0.3 m2, and a theoretical blood flow rate (index 2.4 times BSA) of 4.4 ± 0.7 L/min.The maximum oxygen transfer (VO2) values were 313 mL O2/min (D703), 579 mL O2/min (D903), and 400 mL O2/min (Quadrox), with the D903 being the most superior (P < 0.05). Oxygen (O2) gradients were 320 mm Hg (D703), 235 mm Hg (D903), and 247 mm Hg (Quadrox), meaning D903 and Quadrox are more efficient versus the D703 (P < 0.05). Shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) and diffusing capacity (DmO2) were comparable (P = ns). Diffusing capacity values indexed to BSA (DmO2/m2) were 0.15 mL O2/min/mm Hg/m2 (D703), 0.2 mL O2/min/mm Hg/m2 (D903), and 0.18 mL O2/min/mm Hg/m2 (Quadrox) with D903 outperforming D703 (P < 0.0005). During hypothermia (32.0 ± 0.3°C), there was a lower absolute and relative VO2 for all three oxygenators (P = ns). The O2 gradients, DmO2 and DmO2/m2, were significantly lower for all oxygenators (P < 0.01). Also, Qs/Qt significantly rose for all oxygenators (P < 0.01).The oxygen transfer curve is characteristic to each oxygenator type and represents a tool to quantify oxygenator performance. Using this parameter, we demonstrated significant differences among commercially available oxygenators. However, all three oxygenators are considered to meet the oxygen needs of the patients.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a Novel Polyimide Hollow‐fiber OxygenatorArtificial Organs, 2004
- Clinical evaluation of nine hollow-fibre membrane oxygenatorsPerfusion, 2001
- Comparison of Three Commercially Available Hollow Fiber Oxygenators: Gas Transfer Performance and BiocompatibilityAsaio Journal, 2001
- Cardiopulmonary Bypass IIThe International Journal of Artificial Organs, 2000
- A Siliconized Hollow Fiber Membrane OxygenatorAsaio Journal, 2000
- Experimental evaluation of the Dideco D903 Avant 1.7 hollow-fibre membrane oxygenatorPerfusion, 1998
- Hypothermia, Cardiac Surgery, and Cardiopulmonary BypassPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Clinical oxygen transfer performance of the Sorin Monolyth membrane oxygenatorPerfusion, 1994
- Oxygen transfer performance of a new Sarns membrane oxygenatorPerfusion, 1992
- A comparison of two oxygen transfer strategies: Bentley Univox and the Bard HF 5000Perfusion, 1992