Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the role of coagulation activation after cardiac arrest
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Critical Care
- Vol. 7 (3) , 176-183
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200106000-00006
Abstract
Thrombolysis is an effective causal therapy for patients suffering from massive pulmonary embolism or acute myocardial infarction. In more than 70% of patients with cardiac arrest, one of these two diseases is the underlying cause of deterioration. Nevertheless, because of the fear of severe bleeding complications, thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been contraindicated. Increasing clinical experience and data from open studies now suggest that thrombolysis during CPR can contribute to hemodynamic stabilization and survival in patients with massive pulmonary embolism and acute myocardial infarction, after conventional CPR procedures have been performed unsuccessfully. After administration of thrombolytic agents, some patients have been stabilized even after more than 90 minutes of CPR. Besides the specific causal action of thrombolytic agents at the site of pulmonary emboli and coronary thrombosis, experimental data indicate that thrombolysis during CPR can improve microcirculatory reperfusion, which may be most important in the brain. In accordance with these data, marked activation of blood coagulation without adequate activation of endogenous fibrinolysis has been demonstrated during reperfusion after cardiac arrest. Massive coagulation activation with subsequent fibrin formation is responsible for microcirculatory reperfusion disorders, and thrombolytic therapy may be indicated. However, no controlled studies are available on this therapeutic concept. Because the risk of bleeding complications is potentially associated with the administration of thrombolytic agents, although this occurs far less than anticipated, thrombolysis during CPR is presently a treatment strategy that can be performed on an individual basis. Whether thrombolysis during CPR can improve survival rates and neurologic outcomes should be addressed in randomized, controlled trials.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amiodarone for Resuscitation after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Sudden Cardiac DeathCirculation, 1998
- Immediate Coronary Angiography in Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillationThe Lancet, 1997
- Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction—Selected recent developmentsAnnals of Hematology, 1994
- ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41 299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarctionPublished by Elsevier ,1992
- A Randomized Clinical Study of a Calcium-Entry Blocker (Lidoflazine) in the Treatment of Comatose Survivors of Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Cause of death in unsuccessful prehospital resuscitationJournal of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Erfolgreiche Behandlung einer fulminanten Lungenembolie durch hochdosierte Bolusinjektion von Urokinase während der kardiopulmonalen ReanimationAINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie, 1991
- Randomized Clinical Study of Thiopental Loading in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986