Benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients depends on PI used in HAART regimen - ANRS 111 trial
- 31 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 23 (4) , 491-500
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00693.x
Abstract
As a result of high inter-patient variability, and efficacy-concentration and toxicity-concentration relationships, optimization of HIV-protease inhibitor (PI) doses based on plasma concentrations could be beneficial. During a 48-week open prospective non-randomized interventional study of 115 protease inhibitor-naive patients initiating an indinavir/ritonavir- or lopinavir/ritonavir-, or nelfinavir-containing therapy, protease inhibitor dose was modified when plasma trough concentrations (C(trough)) at weeks 2, 8, 16 and 24 were outside predefined optimal concentration ranges. Failure of the strategy was defined as the proportions of patients with HIV-RNA above 200 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 48 and/or experiencing grades 2, 3 or 4 PI-related adverse events during the study; proportion of patients with last C(trough) measurement outside the concentration range was determined at each visit. Virological failure and/or occurrence of adverse event were observed in 37/94 assessable patients (39%; 95% CI: 29.4-50.0). In the on-treatment analysis, failure of the strategy was noted in 16% of indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients (8/51; 95% CI: 7.0-28.6; virological failure: 2; adverse event: 6) but in 44% of nelfinavir-treated patients (11/25; 95% CI: 24.4-65.1; virological failure: 10; adverse event: 1); C(trough) concentrations outside the range were less frequent at the last measurement than at W2 (41% vs. 66%; P < 0.05), with proportions of 35% for indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients, but 57% for nelfinavir-treated patients. The proposed strategy of therapeutic drug monitoring may be beneficial to indinavir/r- and lopinavir/r-treated patients, but failed to move concentrations into the predefined range and to produce the expected virological success for nelfinavir-treated patients.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indinavir Trough Concentration as a Determinant of Early Nephrolithiasis in HIV-1-Infected AdultsTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2007
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Antiretroviral Salvage Therapy Guided by Rules-Based or Phenotype-Driven HIV-1 Genotypic Drug-Resistance Interpretation With or Without Concentration-Controlled Intervention: The Resistance and Dosage Adapted Regimens (RADAR) StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- GENOPHAR: a randomized study of plasma drug measurements in association with genotypic resistance testing and expert advice to optimize therapy in patients failing antiretroviral therapy*HIV Medicine, 2004
- Incidence of and Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Reactions in a Prospective Cohort of HIV-Infected Adults Initiating Protease Inhibitor--Containing TherapyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Determination of indinavir and nelfinavir trough plasma concentration efficacy thresholds according to virological response in HIV‐infected patientsHIV Medicine, 2004
- Therapeutic drug monitoring of nelfinavir and indinavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individualsAIDS, 2003
- PharmAdaptAIDS, 2002
- A Retrospective, Cohort-Based Survey of Patients Using Twice-Daily Indinavir + Ritonavir Combinations: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and EfficacyJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Pharmacological Basis for Concentration-Controlled Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and IndinavirAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Efficacy and safety of twice daily first-line ritonavir/indinavir plus double nucleoside combination therapy in HIV-infected individualsAIDS, 2000