The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 October 2007
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 147 (8) , 573-577
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
Abstract
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover 3 main study designs: cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors, to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all 3 study designs and 4 are specific for cohort, case–control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available at http://www.annals.org and on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic reviewThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studiesCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal ResearchAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practiceBMJ, 2004
- Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyondCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careBMJ, 1996