The Final 10-Year Follow-Up Results From the BARI Randomized Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 2 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 49 (15) , 1600-1606
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.048
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Status of the TrialsJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2006
- Drug-Eluting Stents and Late Adverse Clinical OutcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Comparison of Long-Term (Seven Year) Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization With Versus Without StentingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Five-Year Outcomes After Coronary Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent ImplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Clinical and Economic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Percutaneous and Surgical Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease PatientsCirculation, 2001
- Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic statusJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Long-term clinical follow-up in patients with angiographic restudy after successful angioplasty.Circulation, 1993