An Assessment of past and Current Approaches to Quality in Higher Education
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian Journal of Education
- Vol. 42 (3) , 237-255
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419804200303
Abstract
THIS paper argues that, despite an increasing uniformity of approach to quality monitoring, there is little analysis of the rationale behind the methods because there is little exploration of what ‘quality’ is in a higher education context. Despite good intentions, quality monitoring has become over-bureaucratic and the potential for significant change has been hampered by a focus on accountability rather than improvement. Furthermore, the accountability focus, despite its onerous and somewhat oppressive burden, is a safe process for higher education because it does not consider the nature of learning or what is learned. By focusing on accountability, the transformative potential of quality monitoring is not fulfilled.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance Indicators Relating to Student Development: can they be trusted?Quality in Higher Education, 1998
- Quality Assurance in Australian Higher Education: the case of Monash UniversityQuality in Higher Education, 1997
- Quality Monitoring as an Institutional EnterpriseQuality in Higher Education, 1997
- External Quality Monitoring in New Zealand Tertiary EducationQuality in Higher Education, 1997
- EditorialQuality in Higher Education, 1997
- Systematic Higher Education Assessment and Departmental Impacts: translating the effort to meet the needQuality in Higher Education, 1995
- Defining QualityAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1993
- Quality evaluations in the management of basic and applied researchResearch Policy, 1990