Comparison of Single- and Dual-Coil Active Pectoral Defibrillation Lead Systems
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 31 (6) , 1391-1394
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00103-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing an Active Can Implantable Defibrillator with a Passive Can SystemPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Transvenous Defibrillation Lead SystemsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1996
- A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Size on Unipolar Defibrillation System EfficacyCirculation, 1995
- Clinical predictors of the defibrillation threshold with the unipolar implantable defibrillation systemJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Technology: Improved Performance and Lower Defibrillation ThresholdsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- A Prospective Randomized Cross‐Over Comparison of Mono‐ and Biphasic Defibrillation Using Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations in HumansJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1994
- Consistent Subcutaneous Prepectoral Implantation of a New Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1994
- A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system.Circulation, 1993
- Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.Circulation, 1991