Performance of a Flat-Panel Detector in Detecting Artificial Bone Lesions: Comparison with Conventional Screen-Film and Storage-Phosphor Radiography
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 222 (2) , 453-459
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2222010276
Abstract
To compare a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system in detecting small artificial osseous lesions simulating osteolytic disease and to assess diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose. Artificial lesions (0.5-3.0 mm) were created in 100 of 200 predefined regions in 20 porcine femoral specimens. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to create absorption and scatter radiation conditions comparable with those in a human extremity. Imaging was performed with a flat-panel detector system, a conventional screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system. Levels of exposure equivalent to speed classes 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images, the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for 4,800 observations (600 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated with the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.820 (speed class 400), 0.780 (class 800), 0.758 (class 1600), and 0.676 (class 3200) for the flat-panel detector; 0.761 (class 400), 0.725 (class 800), and 0.662 (class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system; and 0.788 (class 400) for the conventional screen-film system. The A(z) value for the flat-panel detector at speed class 400 was significantly higher than that for all other systems (P <.05). A(z) values for the speed class 400 screen-film system and flat-panel detector system at speed class 800 were not significantly different. The flat-panel detector has diagnostic performance superior to that of conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography for detecting small artificial osseous lesions at clinical exposure settings. With the flat-panel detector, exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain diagnostic performance comparable with that of a conventional speed class 400 screen-film system.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulated Bone Erosions in a Hand Phantom: Detection with Conventional Screen-Film Technology versus Cesium Iodide-Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel DetectorRadiology, 2000
- Digital Radiography with a Large-Area, Amorphous-Silicon, Flat-Panel X-Ray Detector SystemInvestigative Radiology, 2000
- Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography in Chest ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions with Normal and Reduced Radiation DoseInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Amorphous Silicon, Flat-Panel, X-Ray Detector Versus Screen-Film RadiographyInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Construction and evaluation of a prototype real‐time detectorMedical Physics, 1997
- Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiencyMedical Physics, 1997
- Flat-Panel X-Ray Detector Using Amorphous Silicon TechnologyInvestigative Radiology, 1997
- X‐ray imaging using amorphous selenium: Feasibility of a flat panel self‐scanned detector for digital radiologyMedical Physics, 1995