Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 80 (951) , 177-185
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19929794
Abstract
European states within the EEC are required to establish and use diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in X-ray examinations. However, up to now there have been no DRLs for cardiac catheterization in children, nor as a rule is the effective dose estimated. We have evaluated the dose–area products (DAPs) for three different types of angiocardiography systems over a time span of 8 years. For each system DAP increased in proportion to the body weight (BW) over two orders of magnitude. The proportionality constant decreased over the years. To reduce the broad distribution of DAP the doses for cine acquisition (DAPA) and fluoroscopy (DAPF) were indexed with respect to the total numbers of acquired images (AN) and the total times of fluoroscopy (FT). DAPA/AN is directly proportional to BW with a high correlation (r = 0.896, n = 1346). Likewise, DAPF/FT is proportional to BW from 0.1 kg to 100 kg (r = 0.84, n = 2138). Therefore, by normalizing DAP to BW the growth dependent variation of DAP can be eliminated. There are numerous short examinations with very small total DAPs, which were separated from the group of diagnostic examinations. The mean DAP/BW of this group is 0.41 Gycm2 kg−1 (90th percentile: 0.81 Gycm2 kg−1, n = 1106). For interventional procedures in congenital heart diseases DAP/BW is significantly higher (p2 kg−1, 90th percentile: 1.16 Gycm2 kg−1, n = 883). There are significant differences between different types of interventional procedures, the mean values being between 0.35 Gycm2 kg−1 (occlusion of patent ductus botalli, n = 165) and 1.30 Gycm2 kg−1 (occlusion of ventricular septal defect, n = 32). For patients who are catheterized several times over the years, the cumulative effective dose (E) may reach high values, being especially high for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (typically 11 mSv). E is derived from DAP/BW by use of a constant DAP/BW to E conversion factor, independent of the age of the patient. DAP/BW is appropriate to describe paediatric DRLs and is recommended instead of using mean DAP values for age groups.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient-Specific Dose and Radiation Risk Estimation in Pediatric Cardiac CatheterizationCirculation, 2005
- Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 2004
- Fehlerhafte Dosismessungen bei kinderkardiologischen UntersuchungenRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2004
- Standardization of Occupational Dose to Patient DAP Enables Reliable Assessment of Radiation-Protection Devices in Invasive CardiologyRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2003
- Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizationsThe British Journal of Radiology, 2003
- Körperbau und Strahlenexposition bei dynamischen Röntgenuntersuchungen: Ein Beitrag zur Ermittlung nationaler Referenzdosiswerte (II) - Gefördert durch das Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (St.Sch 4163) -RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2001
- Körperbau und Strahlenexposition bei statischen Röntgenuntersuchungen (I): Ein Beitrag zur Ermittlung nationaler Referenzdosiswerte - Gefördert durch das Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (St.Sch 4163) -RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2001
- Conversion factors for the estimation of effective dose in paediatric cardiac angiographyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2000
- Effective doses for coronary angiographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1996
- An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinationsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1995