Importance of Catheter Contact Force During Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model Using a Force‐Sensing Catheter
Top Cited Papers
- 25 June 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 21 (7) , 806-811
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01693.x
Abstract
Effect of Ablation Electrode Contact Force. Introduction: Ablation electrode–tissue contact has been shown to be an important determinant of lesion size and safety during nonirrigated ablation but little data are available during irrigated ablation. We aimed to determine the importance of contact force during irrigated‐tip ablation. Methods and Results: Freshly excised hearts from 11 male pigs were perfused and superfused using fresh, heparinized, oxygenated swine blood in an ex vivo model. One‐minute ablations were placed using one of 3 different power control strategies (impedance control—15 Ω target impedance drop, and 20 W or 30 W fixed power) and 3 different contact forces (2 g, 20 g, and 60 g) to give a grid of 9 ablation groups. The force sensing catheter (Tacticath™, Endosense SA) was irrigated at 17 mL/min for all of the ablations. Of a total 101 ablations, no thrombus formation was noted but popping was seen in 17 lesions. The lesion depth and incidence of pops was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm /0%, 5.0 ± 1.6 mm /10% and 6.7 ± 2.5 mm /45% for the 15 Ω, 20 W, and 30 W groups (P < 0.01), respectively, and 4.4 ± 1.8 mm /3%, 5.8 ± 1.6 mm /17% and 6.6 ± 2.0 mm /37% for the 2 g, 20 g, and 60 g groups, respectively (P < 0.01). The impedance drop in the first 5 seconds was significantly correlated to catheter contact force: 9.7 ± 9.9 Ω, 22.3 ± 11.0 Ω, and 41.7 ± 22.1 Ω, respectively, for the 2 g, 20 g, and 60 g groups (Pearson's r = 0.65, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Catheter contact force has an important impact on both ablation lesion size and the incidence of pops. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 806‐811, July 2010)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship Between Catheter Forces, Lesion Characteristics, “Popping,” and Char Formation: Experience with Robotic Navigation SystemJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009
- Safety Profiles and Lesion Size of Different Radiofrequency Ablation Technologies: A Comparison of Large Tip, Open and Closed Irrigation CathetersJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009
- Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and ThrombusCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2008
- A Systematical Analysis of In Vivo Contact Forces on Virtual Catheter Tip/Tissue Surface Contact during Cardiac Mapping and InterventionJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2008
- Impedance and Temperature Monitoring Improve the Safety of Closed‐Loop Irrigated‐Tip Radiofrequency AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2007
- Indication of the radiofrequency induced lesion size by pre-ablation measurementsEP Europace, 2005
- Cooled Intramural Needle Catheter Ablation Creates Deeper Lesions than Irrigated Tip Catheter AblationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2004
- Can Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Ablation Be Predicted By the Temperature Rise to a Low Power Test Pulse in Vitro?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- FEM analysis of predicting electrode-myocardium contact from RF cardiac catheter ablation system impedanceIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2002
- Determinants of Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: The Role of Electrode‐Tissue Contact Pressure and Duration of Energy DeliveryJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1991