Corruption, Extortion, and the Boundaries of the Law
Open Access
- 5 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization
- Vol. 25 (2) , 442-471
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn009
Abstract
We consider a setup in which a principal must decide whether or not to legalize a socially undesirable activity. The law is enforced by a monitor who may be bribed to conceal evidence of the offense and who may also engage in extortionary practices. The principal may legalize the activity even if it is a very harmful one. The principal may also declare the activity illegal knowing that the monitor will abuse the law to extract bribes out of innocent people. Our model offers a novel rationale for legalizing possession and consumption of drugs while continuing to prosecute drug dealers. (JEL D82, L22, K4)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- INCENTIVES FOR CORRUPTIBLE AUDITORS IN THE ABSENCE OF COMMITMENT*Journal of Industrial Economics, 2006
- Organized crime, corruption and punishmentJournal of Public Economics, 2005
- The Role of Wages and Auditing during a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos AiresThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2003
- Hierarchies, incentives and collusion in a model of enforcementJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2002
- Corruption and optimal law enforcementJournal of Public Economics, 2001
- Graft, Bribes, and the Practice of CorruptionJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2000
- On Monitoring and Collusion in HierarchiesJournal of Economic Theory, 2000
- Corruption, extortion and evasionJournal of Public Economics, 1999
- Collusion in Hierarchical AgencyEconometrica, 1993
- Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of EnforcersThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1974